Handcuffs and mind control at the University of Ottawa

uOttawa student Marc Kelly cuffed outside of a meeting of the Senate, after inviting all 36,000 students of the University to attend and hear President Allan Rock's speech on Freedom of Expression. (Click the picture for the video invite).
The University of Ottawa campus is dangerous territory. In a setting filled with young people brought here under the pretext that they will grow intellectually in “an atmosphere of open dialogue” [1], extra precaution has to be taken to ensure that uncontrolled ideas don’t upset the institution’s overriding unstated missions of societal engineering, obedience training, and globalization [2,3].
Together with the legal system, including police and prosecutors for the Crown, the University administration has tightened its squeeze on free thought and cut off the air to public debate between members of the academic community over the issues that are most fundamental to their own control of their lives, work, and education on campus. Beyond the professor’s marking pen and report card, the tools that are now being used to keep genuine and heartfelt ideas in check are the muscle, gun, and uniform of the cop along with the systemic weight of court conditions, criminal records, and jail time eagerly wielded by Ottawa’s Crown attorneys. The enforcers of the law of mind control must keep a hard-head and know when to use force: arresting and handcuffing students, as well as campus-wide bans under the Ontario Trespass to Property Act are the order of the day [4].
As just one example out of many, I was arrested in December, 2009 following a student event promoting freedom of expression on campus. Campus security (Protection Services) alleged that I participated in the painting of a message that read “These Walls Belong to Students” on a blank cement billboard wall that was temporarily empty between poster installations, and had Constable John Black of the Ottawa Police Service arrest me on charges of Mischief Under $5000 [5]. Prior to making the arrest, security secretly filmed and observed the event from several office windows in the University Centre, including the Women’s Resource Centre and the Teaching Assistant Union office. When union president Sean Kelly, who was in the office at the time, asked a Protection Services agent why he did not approach the event, he responded that he “did not want to disturb the students.”
It is curious that security stood by and watched what they considered to be “property damage”, without intervening to protect the property. Instead, they covertly observed and filmed the student event, waiting until it was over to approach the scene.
Why did University President Allan Rock approve that the painting of a political message on a campus backing wall for posters be pushed into the courts, despite requests from students that the charge be dropped and the debate over freedom of expression opened to the community [6]? Wouldn’t it have been healthier to contemplate and discuss novel forms of student participation in deciding what ideas are portrayed on campus, rather than attack the students who raise these issues using the criminal system?
Not if the goal is for the administration to increase its control and ownership of the campus mental landscape and the formative activity that takes place there. When students start to speak out and act out and claim the educational environment that is promised to them in the University’s highest-level policy statements and principles, it automatically threatens the administration-controlled marketing apparatus that is used to draw in a steady supply of raw resources (students) for the diploma factory [7]. It throws a wrench in the gears of the image control machine that takes power-serving intellectual work and produces political influence and further degradation of the status quo in Canada and around the globe, wherever Canada’s University is implanting its brand [2, 8]. The University has had to step up its efforts to make sure the critical thoughts that challenge this reality never escape from whatever distant recesses of the intellect they are confined to.
Immediately after arresting me, the University trespassed me from all campus lands and buildings including the first-year physics laboratory classrooms, where I worked as a Teaching Assistant, from my office, where I do graduate level research in physics, and from the office of my supervisor, with whom I meet weekly to discuss my research. They arrested and handcuffed me again and charged me for trespassing when I went to President Allan Rock’s office to make an appointment to discuss removing the trespass notice [5]. Campus security even removed me from my departmental Christmas party in front of my research supervisor, my work supervisor, and my fellow students. I didn’t have time to try a piece of the cake I’d brought for the gathering.
The trespassing charge was dropped by the Crown six months later, after President Rock and his Vice-President were subpoenaed to testify at the trial [9]. But the damage was already done: the locks that the University installs on the minds of its students are made of intimidation and fear. When other students see this kind of punishment happen or they hear about it from their place in the soul-battering wastes of academia, the reaction is instinctive and the lesson is learned immediately: obey or be crushed. Stop being yourself, stop developing your own interpretations of University principles and what it means to be a student or face the courts, get slapped with a criminal record, and have the “privilege” of access to campus, job prospects, and the ability to travel suddenly removed from you. The result is that students learn to kill that niggling part of the self that knows its humanity is being mutilated [10].
As it has always done, the University trains its students to not think. Honesty and independence are bludgeoned out of the student’s brain. These days the weapons are becoming more vicious and the harm they inflict on students is extending outside of the academic world into all of Canadian society via criminal punishments and onto the body in the form of muscular abuse. The University of Ottawa has ramped up to the next level of mind control, and it’s not pretty.
For reference:
[1] The University of Ottawa’s Mission and Values: Vision 2010
[2] Disciplined Minds – book by Jeff Schmidt
[3] Canadian Education as an Impetus towards Fascism – essay by Denis Rancourt
[4] Saying ‘no’ to no trespassing – news article by Charlotte Bailey, The University of Ottawa’s Fulcrum
[5] U of O revokes no trespassing notice to banned student -news article by Kitty So, The Carleton Charlatan
[6] SAC writes to U of O President Allan Rock… – news article by the SFUO Student Appeals Centre
[7] Digital Diploma Mills – book by David Noble
[8] Study Abroad in the Age of Global Empire – essay from the New York University Disorientation Guide 2009
[9] University of Ottawa student activist not guilty of trespassing – news article by Yamreot Taddese, The University of Toronto Varsity
[10] Need for and practice of student liberation – essay by Denis Rancourt